Skip to main content

Horner Sacked!

Well slap my thigh and call me Gladys.  Check the calendar, nope yesterday wasn't the 31st March.

Red Bull Racing have sacked Christian Horner.

Seriously?!?!  This feels like one of those football sackings when a top team is struggling and whaddya gonna do?  It's "quicker" to replace the man at the top than the entire squad.  But F1 is an engineering formula, there aren't three races to get your "new manager bounce" and bag some points.

I guess the problem is that Horner didn't demonstrate he could change the management philosophy he had been responsible for.  The relentless focus on Verstappen has resulted in a car that only he can get performance out of and perhaps a team that simply doesn't know any other way to build the platform.

I don't think it's about losing Newey - or if it is then Horner is well out of there and RB GmbH is incredibly short-termist.  Newey, Marshall and Wheatley were going to leave one day.  Similarly it can't be about keeping Verstappen who will leave one day.  But perhaps it's about succession.  They have not been replaced to maintain the level of performance.

Mekies job is surely to find and shape those replacements.  However he is starting "saddled" with the staff he has.  And definitely handicapped with the young driver programme and Marko consistently being unable to deliver a Ricciardo replacement.  Let alone a Verstappen successor.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ignorance in 2025 is bliss for 2026?

Regarding Mercedes plight at understanding its car:- Why it took so long for Mercedes to expose failed F1 car upgrade The lack of correlation between the Mercedes simulator tools and the track has been apparent in the ground effect era.  In 2022 they persisted with designs in which the car was an unstable nightmare that had performance (according to the simulations) that they just needed to "unlock" (get the set-up window right for).  The problem was that the optimal set-up window lasted less than a track session.  Get it right for FP1 and it would be nowhere for FP2, and so on. It is surprising it has taken so long for them to fix this, but then, equally it seems to be a pattern up and down the grid.   RBR hit the GE era running with a car with the most usable window, of all.  Ferrari's F1-75 had a narrower set-up window within which it could outrun the RB18 .    The following year, you'd think that Ferrari would widen their set-up window a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Red Bull Racing - it's now business first, not sport.

Regarding :- Red Bull power play: How Austria is tightening its grip on the F1 team As soon as Mateshietz died, the passion project died with him and the suits in Red Bull started circling for the power, the glamour and of course the increased profits to turn into bonuses that they can get from Red Bull Racing.  They'd believe they can transition their undoubted expertise at running a marketing company that makes a drink under license and rebrands it into an elite sporting field at the pinnacle of engineering that actually manufactures real products with unique IP to remorseless, relentless deadlines.  This is going to be tested in real time in the glare of global publicity.  Barely anyone notices if the new flavour of sloshy caffeine is a week late.  They do if the new front wing is. The first example of this was the fact that Alpha Tauri was told to wash it's own face economically, hence the rebrand and the consolidation into the UK. RBR will now "enjoy" all t...
Post a Comment
Read more

So what does Red Bull think it's gaining by firing Horner?

  One way of looking at Horner's firing is that the team considers itself in rebuild mode. They need a new development philosophy and perhaps a bit of a restructure to fill any gaps left by those that have left. Horner had potentially not demonstrated that he felt the need, or perhaps wasn't moving quickly enough, to achieve this. The tools have been allowed to grow stale - the wind tunnel and so on - and that was under his watch. A watch that had no limitations when it came to funding there was no reason a new wind tunnel couldn't have been ready for the ground effect era and now it won't be ready to design the 2026 car. It may even be that Horner's effectiveness was blunted in the cost cap era. He built RBR in Mateshietz's money-no-object passion project. If that meant building two updates so both drivers got pace added tot he car in the manner they could deal with RBR could afford it. For example the two sets of exhausts that the team ran in the blown diffuse...
Post a Comment
Read more