Skip to main content

Ignorance in 2025 is bliss for 2026?

Regarding Mercedes plight at understanding its car:-

Why it took so long for Mercedes to expose failed F1 car upgrade

The lack of correlation between the Mercedes simulator tools and the track has been apparent in the ground effect era.  In 2022 they persisted with designs in which the car was an unstable nightmare that had performance (according to the simulations) that they just needed to "unlock" (get the set-up window right for).  The problem was that the optimal set-up window lasted less than a track session.  Get it right for FP1 and it would be nowhere for FP2, and so on.


It is surprising it has taken so long for them to fix this, but then, equally it seems to be a pattern up and down the grid.  

RBR hit the GE era running with a car with the most usable window, of all.  Ferrari's F1-75 had a narrower set-up window within which it could outrun the RB18.    The following year, you'd think that Ferrari would widen their set-up window and get closer to RBR, but the opposite happened and RBR stomped the field with a concept that come the middle of the following season was being outpaced by McLaren who "came from nowhere".  

However for 2026 the aero balance is shifting away from ground effect and thus away from the need for a rigid platform.  Perhaps the teams have not rushed to plug their ground effect ignorance because it's going to be a diminished skillset?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Alpine : Plus Ca Change ?

Regarding:- How can Alpine turn around its plummeting F1 performance? When though has the Enstone team been different? When it was Benetton? When it was Renault first time around I guess. Since then it's been making up the numbers really. Where has the statement been that it really, really, wants a tilt at the title? The closest statement was the big money signing of Ricciardo and the whole project around him as their race winning, franchise driver around whom they were going to build a future. But he bailed and that programme whithered away back into making up the numbers culminating with a return to being a customer team. Renault need to sell up as their heart has not really been in F1 since Crashgate. They could still buy title sponsorship if they want to maintain Alpine branding in F1 and the team can still have its collection of showy investors as it tootles around a closed shop league.
Post a Comment
Read more

Red Bull Racing - it's now business first, not sport.

Regarding :- Red Bull power play: How Austria is tightening its grip on the F1 team As soon as Mateshietz died, the passion project died with him and the suits in Red Bull started circling for the power, the glamour and of course the increased profits to turn into bonuses that they can get from Red Bull Racing.  They'd believe they can transition their undoubted expertise at running a marketing company that makes a drink under license and rebrands it into an elite sporting field at the pinnacle of engineering that actually manufactures real products with unique IP to remorseless, relentless deadlines.  This is going to be tested in real time in the glare of global publicity.  Barely anyone notices if the new flavour of sloshy caffeine is a week late.  They do if the new front wing is. The first example of this was the fact that Alpha Tauri was told to wash it's own face economically, hence the rebrand and the consolidation into the UK. RBR will now "enjoy" all t...
Post a Comment
Read more