Skip to main content

Coulthard - elite level but only occasionally great

“I never won the world championship, but there were moments where I was, to be arrogant, world-class against world-class performers,” David Coulthard explained to The Athletic.

“What they were was consistently world-class. And I dipped in and out of it. My performances were like that, so that’s why the result books reflect the drivers at that time. Mika was consistently quick. Michael was consistently quick. They got the world championships.”


Coulthard has explained even further. He recognised during his career the days on which he was untouchable and the steps he took to try to bottle that lightning. He engaged sports psychologists to try to work out what went so well on those days and to be able to reproduce it. But he admits he couldn't.


There are of course a number of reasons for it all needing to come together and in the midst is the frailty of the human condition. A human that needs to be performing within a tenth of a second at all times. Even if only driving to a target lap time. That is what the greats can do and what even the bloody excellent occasionally can't.


Part of this comes down to the manner of competing too. You take every advantage you can get - that is what the greats also do. In !997 Coulthard had two race wins to Hakkinen's one. And that one win was gifted to him by McLaren ordering Coulthard to let him by as part of the run out in the final Grand Prix. An advantage Hakkinen took. The very next race in Australia 1998 there was the first corner pact with the fast but fragile cars - the cars would hold station after the first corner. Hakkinen was leading but a hearing mix-up caused him to come into the pits unnecessarily and putting Coulthard into the lead. A lead he gave back when it was explained it had been a mix-up. An advantage Coulthard relinquished.


Coulthard probably did the "right" thing in both instances. But by giving up those advantages that he had earned by racing hard and not making mistakes, he validated any pattern there was in the team. But all of that makes up the person he was and is.


The greats build a team around them so that even when they disobey team orders it's as much a team problem as it is their own.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ignorance in 2025 is bliss for 2026?

Regarding Mercedes plight at understanding its car:- Why it took so long for Mercedes to expose failed F1 car upgrade The lack of correlation between the Mercedes simulator tools and the track has been apparent in the ground effect era.  In 2022 they persisted with designs in which the car was an unstable nightmare that had performance (according to the simulations) that they just needed to "unlock" (get the set-up window right for).  The problem was that the optimal set-up window lasted less than a track session.  Get it right for FP1 and it would be nowhere for FP2, and so on. It is surprising it has taken so long for them to fix this, but then, equally it seems to be a pattern up and down the grid.   RBR hit the GE era running with a car with the most usable window, of all.  Ferrari's F1-75 had a narrower set-up window within which it could outrun the RB18 .    The following year, you'd think that Ferrari would widen their set-up window a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Red Bull Racing - it's now business first, not sport.

Regarding :- Red Bull power play: How Austria is tightening its grip on the F1 team As soon as Mateshietz died, the passion project died with him and the suits in Red Bull started circling for the power, the glamour and of course the increased profits to turn into bonuses that they can get from Red Bull Racing.  They'd believe they can transition their undoubted expertise at running a marketing company that makes a drink under license and rebrands it into an elite sporting field at the pinnacle of engineering that actually manufactures real products with unique IP to remorseless, relentless deadlines.  This is going to be tested in real time in the glare of global publicity.  Barely anyone notices if the new flavour of sloshy caffeine is a week late.  They do if the new front wing is. The first example of this was the fact that Alpha Tauri was told to wash it's own face economically, hence the rebrand and the consolidation into the UK. RBR will now "enjoy" all t...
Post a Comment
Read more

So what does Red Bull think it's gaining by firing Horner?

  One way of looking at Horner's firing is that the team considers itself in rebuild mode. They need a new development philosophy and perhaps a bit of a restructure to fill any gaps left by those that have left. Horner had potentially not demonstrated that he felt the need, or perhaps wasn't moving quickly enough, to achieve this. The tools have been allowed to grow stale - the wind tunnel and so on - and that was under his watch. A watch that had no limitations when it came to funding there was no reason a new wind tunnel couldn't have been ready for the ground effect era and now it won't be ready to design the 2026 car. It may even be that Horner's effectiveness was blunted in the cost cap era. He built RBR in Mateshietz's money-no-object passion project. If that meant building two updates so both drivers got pace added tot he car in the manner they could deal with RBR could afford it. For example the two sets of exhausts that the team ran in the blown diffuse...
Post a Comment
Read more