Skip to main content

Coulthard - elite level but only occasionally great

“I never won the world championship, but there were moments where I was, to be arrogant, world-class against world-class performers,” David Coulthard explained to The Athletic.

“What they were was consistently world-class. And I dipped in and out of it. My performances were like that, so that’s why the result books reflect the drivers at that time. Mika was consistently quick. Michael was consistently quick. They got the world championships.”


Coulthard has explained even further. He recognised during his career the days on which he was untouchable and the steps he took to try to bottle that lightning. He engaged sports psychologists to try to work out what went so well on those days and to be able to reproduce it. But he admits he couldn't.


There are of course a number of reasons for it all needing to come together and in the midst is the frailty of the human condition. A human that needs to be performing within a tenth of a second at all times. Even if only driving to a target lap time. That is what the greats can do and what even the bloody excellent occasionally can't.


Part of this comes down to the manner of competing too. You take every advantage you can get - that is what the greats also do. In !997 Coulthard had two race wins to Hakkinen's one. And that one win was gifted to him by McLaren ordering Coulthard to let him by as part of the run out in the final Grand Prix. An advantage Hakkinen took. The very next race in Australia 1998 there was the first corner pact with the fast but fragile cars - the cars would hold station after the first corner. Hakkinen was leading but a hearing mix-up caused him to come into the pits unnecessarily and putting Coulthard into the lead. A lead he gave back when it was explained it had been a mix-up. An advantage Coulthard relinquished.


Coulthard probably did the "right" thing in both instances. But by giving up those advantages that he had earned by racing hard and not making mistakes, he validated any pattern there was in the team. But all of that makes up the person he was and is.


The greats build a team around them so that even when they disobey team orders it's as much a team problem as it is their own.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Drugovich to Cadillac?

 Regarding Valtteri Bottas closes in on F1 return with Cadillac for 2026 Whilst I can understand Alonso not wanting Drugovich to demonstrate any, considerably cheaper, pace in the Aston Martin, I am not sure that Drugovich is a threat to Stroll. There can't be many people, within or without Aston Martin, that believe a team with all of the money could not hire a better driver.  Newey has said that "Lance is much better than people give him credit for" which is fair enough I guess, but it's not the ringing endorsement that Alonso gave Stroll  - of being "super young, super talented and has the possibility to be world champion". The question is, has Drugovich been out of the seat for too long to be useful to Cadillac? Certainly it needs at least one of Bottas or Perez.  Perhaps Cadillac will take a punt on Drugovich as a rookie with three years of being in the garage, seeing how the likes of Alonso and of course Stroll operate.  That's apparently potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lessons from swapping Tsunoda' and Lawson's seats

Regarding the article :-   The hard lessons Yuki Tsunoda and Liam Lawson learned after swapping F1 seats There are clues to the problem in this article I think. Tsunoda's comments about how he felt driving the Racing Bulls. Tsunoda was comfortable in the Racing Bull because he'd been driving, testing and help shape that design philosophy for four seasons. This is a design philosophy that has to be a little forgiving in terms of set-up since it is expected to have driver changes at least from season to season, it being the F1 finishing school for RBR. Lawson hasn't had a season at either team. But even where he has had more races, Racing Bulls, he's 18 starts across three cars with no pre-season testing of each new challenger. Both of them have had a go at driving a car honed openly around Verstappen for the last seven seasons - every other driver since Ricciardo left has been hired in a support role. That honing has increasingly focussed on peak performance that Verstap...
Post a Comment
Read more

Alpine : Plus Ca Change ?

Regarding:- How can Alpine turn around its plummeting F1 performance? When though has the Enstone team been different? When it was Benetton? When it was Renault first time around I guess. Since then it's been making up the numbers really. Where has the statement been that it really, really, wants a tilt at the title? The closest statement was the big money signing of Ricciardo and the whole project around him as their race winning, franchise driver around whom they were going to build a future. But he bailed and that programme whithered away back into making up the numbers culminating with a return to being a customer team. Renault need to sell up as their heart has not really been in F1 since Crashgate. They could still buy title sponsorship if they want to maintain Alpine branding in F1 and the team can still have its collection of showy investors as it tootles around a closed shop league.
Post a Comment
Read more