Whilst I applaud any effort to increase overtaking in F1, and certainly support methods that are not artificial (i.e. I don't want to see power-to-pass or success ballast penalties), I am not totally convinced by either Gary Anderson's (Autosport 22/11/2007) or the FIA's proposals. Banning re-fuelling would add several factors to a race :- In summary - lower the front wing, remove all the chassis mounted aerodynamic devices, stick slick tyres on, but for heaven's sake get rid of re-fuelling.
I defer to Gary's far superior knowledge of F1 design than my own, however my first impression of the Anderson spec F1 car was that it reminded me very much of the grid of the second half of the 1994 season. The cars of '94 had larger diffusers, lower front wings, wider and slick tyres and ineffectual air rams (due to a slot cut into the air box). There wasn't a great deal more overtaking then than there is now.
The FIA's approach is similar to Gary's but I agree with him, the idea of a driver adjusting his brake balance forward and cranking up the front wing while alongside another car into a braking area doesn't sound very successful to me. Neither does him cranking both settings down again as he tries to accelerate out of the corner.
Whilst I have reservations about Gary's approach I certainly think there is plenty of merit in them as a starting point. However I think any serious attempt at improving the racing in F1 should address the single biggest factor that has reduced overtaking - re-fuelling.
Monday, November 26, 2007
Improving the Racing
Posted by EI2g at 01:00
Labels: Design, Racecraft, re-fuelling
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment